I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54
，这一点在谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】中也有详细论述
6 February 2026ShareSave
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
Sheriff tells BBC he believes Nancy Guthrie being held close to her home
Следователи отреагировали на исчезновение туристов в российском регионеСК: В Прикамье возбуждено дело после исчезновения группы туристов，这一点在旺商聊官方下载中也有详细论述